да какая разница, что сам кошелек не фигурирует, если фигурируют транзакции из него?
вот что сам биткойн говорит
Mark wants to send 1 BTC to Jessica. To do this, he uses his private key to 'sign' a message with the transaction-specific details. This message, which must be broadcast to the network, will contain the following:
Inputs. This contains information about the bitcoin previously sent to Mark's address. For example, imagine Mark previously received 0.6 BTC from Alice and 0.6 BTC from Bob. Now, in order to send 1 BTC to Jessica, there might be two inputs: one input of 0.6 BTC previously from Alice and one input of 0.6 BTC previously from Bob. Amount. In this case, the amount Mark wants to send is 1 BTC. Outputs. There are outputs. The first is 1.2 BTC (0.6 BTC + 0.6 BTC) to Jessica’s public address. The second is 0.2 BTC returned as 'change' to Mark.
In the above example, Mark (via his wallet software) will broadcast his proposed transaction to the Bitcoin network. A special group of participants in the network known as 'miners' verify that Mark's keys are able to access the inputs (i.e. the address(s) from where he previously received the bitcoin he claims to control.
И на этом вся анонимность заканчивается. Если они могут проверить Марков доступ к инпуту - что тебе еще нужно? Даже если все адреса каждый раз новые, проследить цепочку по транзакциям просто вопрос кросс-референса
no subject
вот что сам биткойн говорит
Mark wants to send 1 BTC to Jessica. To do this, he uses his private key to 'sign' a message with the transaction-specific details. This message, which must be broadcast to the network, will contain the following:
Inputs. This contains information about the bitcoin previously sent to Mark's address. For example, imagine Mark previously received 0.6 BTC from Alice and 0.6 BTC from Bob. Now, in order to send 1 BTC to Jessica, there might be two inputs: one input of 0.6 BTC previously from Alice and one input of 0.6 BTC previously from Bob.
Amount. In this case, the amount Mark wants to send is 1 BTC.
Outputs. There are outputs. The first is 1.2 BTC (0.6 BTC + 0.6 BTC) to Jessica’s public address. The second is 0.2 BTC returned as 'change' to Mark.
In the above example, Mark (via his wallet software) will broadcast his proposed transaction to the Bitcoin network. A special group of participants in the network known as 'miners' verify that Mark's keys are able to access the inputs (i.e. the address(s) from where he previously received the bitcoin he claims to control.
И на этом вся анонимность заканчивается. Если они могут проверить Марков доступ к инпуту - что тебе еще нужно? Даже если все адреса каждый раз новые, проследить цепочку по транзакциям просто вопрос кросс-референса